Rules for Logical Argument

I’m keeping this post to link to from any argument space that I control, like my Facebook wall. I prefer to argue in an objective mode, even if the subject is religion, aesthetics, or politics. I wholly reject the proposition that all categorical statements are political.

This is what I expect from all participants:

1. Do not use logical fallacies, which includes argument against identity, explicit or coded in buzzwords like “mansplain” or “femsplain.” Instead of calling someone out on an obscure fallacy, simply say “that’s not an argument,” and only elaborate if necessary. (Nod to Jack Raynard on this latter idea.)

2. Do not explicitly infer the other person’s viewpoint. It’s irrelevant. As a procedural necessity, everyone must be treated as an authority over their own experience.

3. If the argument gets heated, have each person summarize the other’s point and gain their acceptance of the interpretation before moving on.

4. If you are asked if you are arguing from a certain premise, give an unequivocal answer, no prevaricating with “It’s more complicated than that” if the question must have a yes-or-no answer. You can qualify your position, but at some point, you must also commit to a premise in order to argue at all.

5. Don’t indulge in sarcasm when countering someone’s points.

Advertisements

About robertpkruger

Writer, editor, and software developer. President of ElectricStory.com.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s